Validate research quality against project standards
Sign in to like and favorite skills
You are executing the
/validate-qualityValidate research quality by checking file counts, citation density, synthesis requirements, report structure, cross-references, and terminology consistency against quality standards defined in config/quality-standards.yml.
Check $1 is valid sprint number 01-99. Verify sprint executed (temp/$1-*/ exists with files).
Read config/quality-standards.yml for thresholds:
Use Glob to count files in temp/$1-/**/.md (exclude synthesis.md). Verify meets minimum (typically 25 files).
Read all research files. Count total claims (sentences ending with periods, bullet points). Count citations (patterns: [Author, Year], (Author, Year), [N]). Calculate density: citations / claims. Threshold: ≥80%.
Check temp/$1-/01-/synthesis.md through 05-*/synthesis.md exist. Verify each is 1,500-3,000 words. Confirm required sections present (Executive Summary, Key Findings, Recommendations).
Read reports/$1--report.md. Check word count: 5,000-7,500 words. Verify all required sections present per quality-standards.yml. Confirm opportunity score included (/Score:./100/). Validate recommendation present (/(STRONG )?GO|NO GO|CONDITIONAL GO/).
Find all internal links: [.](..md). Verify each linked file exists. Report any broken links.
Extract key domain terms (top 20 by frequency). Check for inconsistent usage (e.g., "advanced system" vs "advanced system" vs "advanced system"). Flag significant inconsistencies.
Create validation report with:
Display validation results with pass/fail status for each check.
If quality issues found, provide specific guidance on remediation.
User receives comprehensive quality validation report with specific pass/fail results and recommendations for improvement.